R. Colin^{* *}Correspondence: R. Colin, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Sharif, Tehran, Iran, Email:

Author info »

Description

Nuclear power has a lot to offer in terms of the environment. There is no combustion byproducts produced by power plants because they don’t burn any materials. Nuclear plants also contribute to the preservation of air quality and the reduction of climate change because they don’t emit greenhouse gases [1]. Uranium pellets serve as the fuel for nuclear reactors, which use them to produce nuclear fission. Uranium atoms are made to disintegrate inside of a nuclear reactor. Small particles known as fission products are released by the splitting of the atoms. The breakdown of other uranium atoms by fission products sets off a series of subsequent fission events. This chain reaction’s energy release heats things up. For the creation of electricity, this energy must be released.

Nuclear Fusion and Nuclear Fission are the Two Processes that Can Release This Energy

Nuclear fission: All of the nuclear reactors in use today produce heat using nuclear fission as the primary mechanism. Reactors can be categorized according to their cooling method, pressure boundary, kind of nuclear fuel, or neutron spectrum, but all of them produce heat through a fission chain reaction in the nuclear fuel, which is a common characteristic. The architecture of the reactor, the material used to construct its core, the kind of nuclear fuel used, and the fuel cycle that goes along with it are all influenced by the neutron spectrum [2]. The energy of high-energy neutrons is reduced in thermal-neutron-spectrum reactors, as opposed to fast-neutron-spectrum reactors, by the use of a moderator such water, heavy water, or graphite. The dangers of radiation exposure are well known, and even the phrases “nuclear” and “radiation” evoke terror in people. As a result, the goal of international politics is to stop the spread of nuclear weapons. More than any other toxicant, we have a greater body of scientific understanding about the effects of radiation exposure from both internal and external sources.

Nuclear fusion: Plasma is a hot, charged gas that undergoes fusion reactions. It is composed of free-moving electrons and positive ions, and it has special features that set it apart from other states of matter like solids, liquids, and gases [3]. Because some of the mass of the fusing nuclei is transformed into energy, matter is not preserved in the reaction. When two light atoms fuse to form a heavier one, fusion takes place. The newly formed atom has a lower total mass than the two that made it up; the “missing” mass is released as energy. The star’s core, where the majority of nuclear fusion occurs, heats this layer of the ball of superheated plasma that we refer to as the sun. It is no surprise that physicists are eager to replicate this energy source in reactors on our planet because it is so pervasive and essential here. Fusion energy may be used in the future to meet the world’s expanding energy needs in a clean and highly effective manner. Global cooperation is necessary to advance the development of fusion technology and hasten the adoption of nuclear fusion as a reliable energy source. Emerging technologies must be created, tested, and certified alongside the infrastructure and standards that will support them.

Pros of nuclear energy:

1. Carbon-free electricity

2. Small land footprint

3. High power output

4. Reliable energy source

Cons of nuclear energy:

1. Uranium is technically non-renewable

2. Very high upfront costs

3. Nuclear waste

4. Malfunctions can be catastrophic

Advantages of Nuclear Power

The primary benefit of nuclear energy is that it is clean, emits no greenhouse gases, and offers pollution-free power. Contrary to popular belief, nuclear power station cooling towers only spew water vapor, not pollutants or radioactive materials, into the sky [4]. Many scientists agree that nuclear energy is among the cleanest types of energy available today when compared to all other options. Despite the fact that nuclear energy is emission-free and clean, experts point out a hidden risk associated with it: nuclear waste. Nuclear reactor byproducts that are highly radioactive and poisonous can be radioactive for tens of thousands of years. The primary explanation for this is the possibility of recycling up to 90% of the radioactive waste produced during the creation of nuclear energy [5]. In fact, since only a small amount of energy from a reactor’s fuel typically uranium is released during the fission process, the fuel can be processed and utilized in another reactor.

Disadvantages of Nuclear Power

The proliferation of nuclear weapons is the first and currently most discussed drawback of nuclear energy. This discussion was first sparked by the deadly atomic bombings of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War, and it has recently been reopened due to growing concerns over a nuclear escalation of the Ukraine-Russian Conflict [6]. Its goals were to promote peaceful applications of nuclear energy and stop the proliferation of such weapons in order to eventually achieve nuclear disarmament. However, opposes of this energy source continue to believe that nuclear energy is closely related to nuclear weapons technologies and that, as these technologies become more widely accessible, there is a high risk that they will fall into the wrong hands, particularly in nations with high levels of corruption and instability[7]. One of the most expensive and time-consuming sources of energy is nuclear power. The construction of nuclear power plants is extremely expensive and takes a very lengthy period compared to other forms of renewable energy infrastructure, sometimes even more than ten years.

Conclusion

In contrast to other energy sources like hydro, wind, solar, natural gas, and even coal, nuclear power must be economical, safe, and dependable. In the US, commercial nuclear energy development has all but ceased. Nuclear power generating growth has also slowed or stopped in other nations. be quite successful at preventing disease. To structurally help design protective and efficient vaccination antigens, immunological and functional evaluation of bacterial antigens can be integrated with structural knowledge. Improved antigens can be created by combining the ability to isolate barrier protection human monoclonal antibodies (from infected or immunized patients) with the knowledge of the structures of antigens and antigen-antibody complexes. This strategy makes use of the significantly improved capacity to clone human B cells and then to generate the relating recombinant monoclonal immunoglobulin or antigen-binding fragments. The acute viral virus F protein was stabilized in a particular conformation to produce a potent functional protective response in both animals and humans.

References

1. Acharya J. “Fdi, Growth and the environment: evidence from India on Co₂ emission during the last two decades”. J Econ Dev.34, 43–58, (2009).

   [Crossref ] [Google Scholar]

2. Baek J. “A panel cointegration analysis of CO₂ emissions, nuclear energy and income in major nuclear generating countries”. Appl Energy.145, 133–138, (2015).

   [Crossref] [Google scholar]

3. Granger CWJ and Engle RF. “Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing”. Econometric.55, 251–276(1987).

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

4. Kessides I and Adamantiades A. “Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects”. Energy Policy.37, 5149–5166(2009).

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

5. Mestre R Banerjee A, and Dolado J. “Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework”. J Time Ser Anal.19, 267–283, (1998).

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

6. Murshed M. “LPG consumption and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in South Asia: a time-series ARDL analysis with multiple structural breaks”. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28, 8337–8372, (2020b).

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Rasheed A Abdo A-B, Li B, Zhang X and Lu J. “Influence of FDI on environmental pollution in selected Arab countries: a spatial econometric analysis perspective”. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27, 28222–28246, (2020).

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]